The Writing Process Version 2
Wednesday, November 24, 2010
Posted below is the second version of my writing process assignment. As you will see the second document is very different from the first. This version shows the processes that are happening at each step of the writing process as well as the executive functions that are going on at the same time. On the left hand side of the image are various assistive technologies that can be used at each step of the writing process.
Inspiration
Saturday, November 13, 2010
The Writing Process
In class this week we learned about the writing process. What an amazingly complicated process! I don't think most of us consider all the different processes that are involved in writing. As a non neuro person I am blown away by how the brain coordinates all the processes so that they all work together. The fact that all these processes occur at the same time and, for the most part, without any conscious input from the writer blows me away. Any delay in development of, or deficit in, any of the processes can impair if not prevent a person's ability to communicate effectively in a written format.
Our second assignment was to create a diagram of the writing process based on a short piece of writing that we did. Mine is based on the question how do you bbq the perfect steak? As you will see from the diagram below whether you realize it or not, all of the writing process comes into play whenever you are writing.
Misunderstood Minds Website
Blio: Kurzweil for all?
Wednesday, November 3, 2010
I came across this video on Youtube. Being interviewed is Ray Kurzweil (of Kurzweil 3000 fame). He is talking about a new piece of software called Biblio. It is essentially a free e-book reader that will be compatible with all computers and portable devices. In the video you see two demonstrations. The first is of a children's book being read with a pre-recorded track while highlighting words. The second is an anatomy textbook which also has text to speech, quizes and embedded video.
The software is also able to do text to speech from scanned documents. According to the Blio website (http://www.blio.com/) users can add take notes, highlight text, add links and export for use as study materials. At this time the software is available as a free download and is available for the Windows platform only.
Though not intended to replace Kurzweil 3000 this may be of interest to people who want to have a text read out loud to them or who don't qualify for Kurzweil but would benefit from some of its features.
I haven't had a chance to really explore the software yet but I have downloaded it and figured out how to import your own document into the program. You need to have a file in the .xps format which can be created in Word 2007. I'll explore it some more and post a better review later.
Interesting Article on the use of the iPad as Assistive Technology
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
I came across an article in the http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/31/nyregion/31owen.html?_r=1 that tells the story of a 7 year old with a motor neuron disorder who recently began using an iPad. It also discussed a number of other people who are using the iPad as assistive technology. While the article does not go into great detail about the use of the technology it did serve to remind me that assistive technology is not one size fits all. The choice of what technology to recommend and use must be based on the user and their goals.
As the article showed, for all the good that the iPad can do it is no use to you if you can't touch the screen.
Mac OS Kurzweil
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Kurzweil Experiment
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Last week we started looking at a powerful piece of software called Kurweil 3000. Kurzweil can be used with students who have difficulty interacting with a book in the conventional way. Texts can be scanned in to the software and then read back to the student or converted in to an MP3 and put on a portable media device. Students can also use the software to take tests, they can highlight text, get definitions, and create notes.
I decided to put the software to the test with our reading for the week. I converted David Edyburn's Technology-nhanced reading performance : Defining a research agenda using the software and put in on my ipod. It took me a few minutes to get used to the voice that I chose but after that I found that I was able to understand the text with ease. Since I am new with the software I may be missing some features but I missed the inflection of a humans voice. I found the voice somewhat stunted and it had difficulty pronouncing some words that I would have thought were high frequency words.
Even after my first experience with the software I can see the benefit to students. I am sure that as I explore the setting more and customize it to meet my needs I will benefit from it more and more!
Class 4
In this class we explored a variety of tech tools that can be used to assist students in their learning. We completed a treasure hunt which had us explore several websites.
Dragon Dictation
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Reading Is…
To learn more about reading and the brain visit : http://thereadingprocess569.blogspot.com/ to what ch some excellent videos that explain whats going on when we read.
Class 3
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
AT Implementation Article
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
I found this article to be very interesting and I agreed with many of the points it raised.
One of the areas the article looks at is training of teachers in the use of ACT. I agree that this is a major issue in the adoption of ACT by teachers. The reasons for it are many, they include training, time, and wiliness.
One of the issues with the introduction of any AT is training. While every teacher who interacts with the student receiving the AT should receive training it does not always work out that way. Sometimes schedules can't be arranged so that everyone can attend, sometime teachers (and in my experience, specialist teachers) are left out.
The second thing is time. Teachers are, for the most part, juggling more things in the run of the day than they can really manage. Unfortunately anything new that is introduced often falls to the bottom of the pile. They simply don't have the time to take on anything new.
The article discusses the notion of introducing AT training in teacher preservice education. I don't necessarily disagree with this idea but it is not the solution to training teachers in the use of AT. If the correct use of AT means matching the technology to the student then the training that teachers require must also be unique to the student. Teachers can learn the basics in a class or PD session but they can never learn everything they need to know that way.
After reading the article I thought about my experiences with AT and ACT in my schools.
With one particular student who had a cochlea implant and microphone system my experiences was very positive. The system was easy to use, I could raise or lower the volume on my end whenever I needed to and the student could do the same. The only issue that I had was that the student was often "forgetful" and it could sometimes be days before he would remember to bring it to my next class. Truth be told he probably didn't need the system in my class but it was on his IPP so I expected him to have it and for me to use it.
I have also seen issues with the deployment. In one case that I have seen recently a non verbal student has been given an Ipod to help communicate with classmates and teachers. Unfortunately the school does not have a wireless network and has been refused one because they don't want students surfing the net. This has limited the potential for communication and usefulness of this technology with this student... I understand that the search for solutions continues....